Sunday, June 8, 2014

The Kite Runner Socratic Seminar #2 Reflection

The Kite Runner Socratic Seminar #2 Reflection

     There were many things said which influenced my way of thinking during this socratic seminar. One thing that really influenced my way of thinking was when we were discussing if it was cowardly to flee your country during a time of war. I thought it was interesting to hear why some people thought it was cowardly and why others did not. By the end of the seminar, my opinion, that it was not cowardly to flee your country during a time of war, was strengthened by what other people were saying in the circle. One thing that I thought more in-depth about was the role of women in The Kite Runner. I had not really thought about the fact that most women in the story were absent or dead and only Soraya was a prevalent female character.

     I agreed with many of the statements made by my peers. The statement that I most agreed with was that it was not cowardly of Baba to flee Afghanistan with Amir. I do not think it was cowardly of them to flee the country because they were just trying to protect themselves and not be killed. I do not think it is unreasonable for someone to try and avoid being killed. I least agreed with the statement that it is cowardly to flee your country during war because I do not think it is always cowardly to flee your country. If I had the opportunity to say one more thing during the socratic seminar, I would have said that I think it can be cowardly to flee your country, so you can avoid being drafted. However, I don't think it is cowardly if your country is being invaded and devastated by war and all you want to do is protect your children. I would have said this to distinguish that I think that there can be a level of cowardice when it comes to fleeing your country during a time of war.

     One thing that I thought worked well for this seminar was the fact that no one talked over each other. I was a little nervous to be put in the dominator's group at first because I thought that the discussion would be chaotic and everyone would try to talk over one another. However, I think we did a good job at maintaining our composure and respect for one another as a group. Overall, I was proud that we had a fluid conversation without anyone interrupting each other.

     One thing that could use improvement for next time is to perhaps not take a half time. I usually like half times because they help us learn what we can do to improve our conversation. However, I thought that our conversation was flowing very well and the half time sort of threw me off personally because after the half time I found it harder to get involved in the conversation again. Overall, I thought our discussion was nice and fluid and I was proud at how well the dominators did as a group.

The Kite Runner Socratic Seminar #1 Reflection

The Kite Runner Socratic Seminar #1 Reflection

     Our first discussion of the The Kite Runner influenced my way of thinking on a variety of topics. One of the main topics we discussed, that influenced my way of thinking, was what makes a good father. It was interesting to see who thought Baba was a good or bad father and why. One thing that made me think into more depth was when someone asked if Amir should feel guilty about not preventing Hassan's rape. At first I thought of course he should feel guilty, but someone brought up the point that he was a child and was probably completely shocked and did not know what to do. I still think Amir should have felt some level of guilt for not preventing Hassan's rape because he could have prevented it, if he let Assef have the kite.

     There were many statements that my peers made, which I agreed with. The statement that I agreed with most, which was made by one of my peers, was that they would not want to have Baba as a father. I agreed with this statement because Baba does not seem like a good father, since he does not accept who Amir is, and only wants him to follow in his footsteps. The statement I most disagreed with, was when someone said that they would like Baba as a father because they like the idea of tough love. I think tough love is something that works for some kids, but personally I do not like the idea of tough love, since I tend to be more sensitive than others. If I had the opportunity to say anything that I did not get to say, I probably would have defended the idea that Amir should feel guilty about not defending Hassan's rape because all he had to do was give Assef the kite in order to stop it. I would have said this because some people were saying that he should not feel so guilty, since he was only a child but I think that at the time he was just being selfish and cared more about his kite and pleasing Baba, than his friend's safety.

     I think that we all did a good job of participating in this seminar. I'm pleased with the way that everyone in our group got the chance to speak. I'm also pleased that everyone in our circle encouraged people to speak. I also think we did a good job at staying on topic and not drifting away to irrelevant topics. Lastly, I think that the questions that were asked were good, because they sparked in-depth discussions and there were no awkward pauses.

     One thing that could use improvement is to have the non-dominators speak more. Even though everyone in a circle spoke, the non-dominators only spoke about once or twice. Speaking once or twice is not enough to get your full points. Also, the non-dominators should not just speak to get their points. They should try to get into the discussion more and speak because they want their voices and opinions heard. Other than that, I thought this socratic seminar was successful.




Monday, May 19, 2014

1984 Socratic Seminar Preparation 4

Laura Schwartz
Period 1
5/18/14

1984 Socratic Seminar Preparation 4

Part I: Summary

In Book three, Winston and Julia were tortured to the point where they betrayed each other. They no longer love each other and both have submitted to the beliefs of the party.


Part II: Questions

Level 2 Questions

1.     Do you think that the Parsons children were evil for turning their father into the thought-police?

I do not think that the Parsons children are necessarily evil for turning their father into the thought-police. Although it was a horrible thing for the children to do, they did not know any better because throughout their whole lives the party had manipulated them.

2.     What do you think the goal of torturing prisoners is for the party?

I think that the party tortures prisoners, as a way of forcing them to submit to the control of the party. Under such severe pain, people will usually try to do anything to escape the pain. This ultimately led Winston into accepting whatever O’Brien told him, and that was probably the party’s goal.

3.     Why do you think Winston felt so gracious and loving towards O’Brien after O’Brien noted his strength?

I think that Winston was going slightly crazy when he was being tortured. Torture and pain can cause you to not think straight. Emotions were probably spinning through Winston’s head, so when O’Brien said something along the lines of kind, Winston became overwhelmed with gratitude.

4.     Do you think it was wrong of Winston to betray Julia?

I do not think Winston betrayed Julia, just to throw her under the bus. It was not wrong of him to betray her because he did it instinctively. He was not thinking clearly and he was terrified. The party had messed him up psychologically to the point where he betrayed the one he loved.

5.     Why do you think Winston no longer felt love for Julia?
I think that Winston no longer felt love for Julia because the party had completely broken him. After being tortured, he began to think like the party and took no interest in love anymore. The party won full control over his mind and he could not go back to loving Julia.

6.     Why do you think Big Brother made Winston feel happy and safe at the end of the book?
I think Big Brother made Winston feel happy and safe at the end of the book because the party had completely altered Winston’s way of thinking. The party made Winston love Big Brother. Winston most likely feels safe when he sees Big Brother because he knows that if he submits to Big Brother, the party will not go after him.

Level 3 Questions

1.     Can torture break the strongest relationship?

I think that torture can break any relationship because when a person is tortured all they can think about is their own survival and escaping the torture. When you are being tortured, you are not thinking clearly and you do not think about your love for another person. All you want is to escape that torture, so the other person and the relationship becomes irrelevant.

2.     Can totalitarian regimes truly win control over peoples’ minds?

Right now, I do not think totalitarian regimes can truly win control over peoples’ minds because they do not have the technology to do so. Unlike in 1984, for instance, today we don’t have thought-police where we can constantly monitor peoples’ thoughts. Totalitarian regimes can punish and torture those who rebel and cause them to submit to their way of thinking, but they cannot invade or control the thoughts of everyone.

3.     Can totalitarian regimes be good for people?

I do not think totalitarian regimes can be good for people. I do not think that any form of government that tries to control and oppress people so much can be good. Even if the government is doing good things, it is very restrictive and people would not have basic rights, or freedom.

Quotes:

1.     “ War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.” (Party slogans)
2.     “You want it to happen to the other person. You don’t give a damn what they suffer. All you care about is yourself.” (Julia describing her betrayal against Winston, when the party tortured her)







Sunday, May 11, 2014

1984 Socratic Seminar Reflection 3

1984 Socratic Seminar Reflection


           This socratic seminar influenced my way of thinking on the issue of love. I thought that it was interesting to talk about Winston and Julia's relationship and whether we thought that they were actually in love. I thought that Julia's perception of love had been skewed because she had randomly sent Winston a note saying that she loved him and she had been having sex with other men. However, something that made me think more in depth was the whole notion of love. Who's to say that Julia's perception of love is wrong? Maybe people in our society do not have the "right" perception of love. I realized that there might not be a "right" or "wrong" way to love. I came to the conclusion that love is what you make it, and the individual should decide what love means to them.

           I most agreed with a statement made by my classmate that they thought it was strange of Julia to randomly slip Winston a note saying "I love you". Julia had not said a word to Winston before but out of the blue, she told him that she loved him. The statement that I agreed with the least was when someone said that all things come to an end. I do not necessarily think all things come to an end. I think a lot of things in our world have been around for a long time. I think that some things in the world will always last. If I had the chance to say one more thing, I would asked about the singing prole woman in 1984 and what she symbolized. I would have asked about the singing prole woman because I was really curious about her symbolic significance in the story. 

           One thing that worked really well for the socratic seminar was the fact that we started the seminar early, when we did not have a teacher to supervise us. I thought that it was really responsible and mature of us to take the initiative to start the seminar on our own. As usual, it was nice how everyone was respectful to one another and each of us listened to each other. Lastly, I thought the discussion leader did a good job of incorporating different people into the discussion.

           Overall this socratic seminar went very well. One thing that could use improvement in the future would be if we are ever in the situation where we need to start the seminar by ourselves again, everyone needs to be cooperative and help start the seminar. The people on the inside did a good job of starting the discussion and keeping it going. However, some people on the outside were disrespectful because they would not stop talking while we were trying to have our discussion. Other than that, our seminar went well.

Monday, May 5, 2014

1984 Socratic Seminar Reflection 2

                                                      1984 Socratic Seminar Reflection 2

     This socratic seminar caused me to think more about the government of dystopian societies. I had not really thought of the fact that poorer people or people known as the "proles" in 1984, could have more freedom than minor party members in the story. During this socratic seminar, I began to think about that the people who are most intelligent in dystopian societies, are the ones most feared and disliked by the government. The intelligent people are more monitored than the poor and uneducated because the government feels most threatened by them. I had not really thought in depth before that the more educated you are in dystopian societies, the less freedom you have.


     One statement made by one of my peers that I most agreed with was about sexual activity in the society of 1984. I agreed with someone who said that the reason why the government allows sex is for the purpose of producing the next generation of party members. I agreed with this statement because I think the party is trying to continue its rule for many generations to come. There was nothing I recall completely disagreeing with. I pretty much agreed with what everyone had to say. I cannot really think of anything else I would have said during the seminar because I spoke a lot and think that I said everything that I wanted to say.

     I think the fact that we had a discussion leader worked well for the seminar. I think that the discussion leader did a good job of keeping the discussion on track. Also, the discussion leader did a good job of making sure that everyone got the chance to participate. I thought it was really great that everyone got the chance to participate in the seminar because it enriched our discussion.

     One thing that could use improvement for our seminar is possibly using the rhetorical device of ethos more. I thought that we did a good job of incorporating our pathos and logos rhetorical devices. However, next seminar we should work on incorporating more ethos appeals. I think that the biggest thing we could improve on for our socratic seminar is having a balanced discussion where we use all rhetorical devices equally.


Monday, April 28, 2014

1984 Socratic Seminar Reflection 1

Laura Schwartz
Period 1
4/28/14


1984 Socratic Seminar 1 Reflection


This seminar influenced my way of thinking because I began to think more about what it would be like to live in a dystopia. The socratic seminar also helped me understand dystopias more because people asked good questions about the society in 1984, which helped me understand more about overall dystopias. One thing that made me think more in depth was when someone asked about the children in the book of 1984. Someone asked about whether our generation was going down the same path that the children in 1984 were on. I had never thought of the possibility of that happening, so I had to think hard about whether we were actually heading in that direction as a society.


One statement that I agreed with was that 1984 was based off of the totalitarian regimes during World War II. I thought that the book was based off of the totalitarian regimes such as the ones in Germany, Russia, and Spain, especially since Orwell wrote the book shortly after World War II. One statement that I disagreed with was when someone said that they thought the United States was too big to be taken over by a totalitarian ruler or party. If I had the chance to respond to that statement, I would have said that Russia had a totalitarian regime and Russia is the largest country in the world. I would have added on that China also developed a totalitarian regime and it is the fourth largest country in the world. In other words, I think that any country is vulnerable to being taken over by a form of totalitarian government or an authoritarian leader. I would have said this if I had the chance to respond because I felt like that statement was very naive and somewhat silly.


I thought that everyone did a good job of respecting each others’ opinions. I think another thing that went well for the seminar was that everyone prepared their own questions. Because people prepared their own questions, there was a lot of variety in the types of things that were asked and discussions that we had. Another thing that I thought went well was the use of rhetorical devices in our discussion, mainly because it was our first time trying to highlight using rhetorical devices and I think we all did well for our first time doing that. Lastly, I thought that the half time worked well because it helped people become more aware of what they could work on for the second half of the seminar.

One thing that could use improvement is getting 100% participation. Not everyone in our circle spoke, which I thought was kind of disappointing because everyone was respectful and I felt like everyone had the chance to speak, yet not everyone spoke. Another thing that could use a little more improvement is trying to appeal to the rhetorical devices, ethos and pathos more because I felt like we primarily focused on logos. Overall, I thought that this socratic seminar was good and there was not much that we had to improve upon.

Monday, April 7, 2014

VIII Chapter 8

Themes:
1. Life Choices
2. Poverty
3. Mentoring

Quotes

Life Choices
1. "The crime-ridden neighborhood was where Tony and Wes had escaped just days after the murder" (P. 153).

         Wes 2 and his older brother Tony fled to Philadelphia after they had allegedly been involved in the murder of a police officer. This choice to run from the law was a bad decision that did not look good on Tony's part nor Wes's. In the long-run this decision to run away from the law probably influenced the jury to convict Wes of being guilty of first degree murder because running away from the police suggests that he played a part in the crime. Whether Wes had been involved in the crime or not, it was bad decision to run away from the law because running away from the police almost never works in your favor.

2. "...after I completed the internship with him, I would be heading to South Africa for a semester abroad"(P.162).

          At this point in the book, Wes 1 had enrolled in Johns Hopkins University, completed an internship for the mayor of Baltimore and he was on his way to make a journey to South Africa. All of these decisions were decisions that helped Wes achieve a bright future. His decision to study abroad in Africa was a life-changing decision for him because it gave him the opportunity to go on a life- altering trip. In South Africa Wes learned more than simply the culture of South Africa and the history of apartheid; he learned about himself. He learned more values and things from South Africa that he would carry throughout the rest of his life and help him succeed in the future. Wes's decision to study abroad  in South Africa was an insightful decision that would take him on a life-changing journey.

Poverty
3. "The check-cashing stores instead of banks, the rows of beauty salons, liquor stores, laundromats, funeral homes, and their graffiti-laced walls were the universal streetscape of poverty" (P. 153)

         Here, Wes 2 was walking the streets of North Philadelphia, where he noted that the streets were not much different from his own neighborhood in Baltimore. The author of the book stresses the fact that poverty occurs in almost all parts of the world. Poverty is a universal force that causes many people and communities to struggle. In America, there are basic signs that a neighborhood suffers from poverty such as graffiti walls, and rows of beauty salons. Throughout this book, poverty in a recurring theme for both of the Wes Moores. The difference between the two, is that one Wes Moore rises above poverty and crime, while the other remains trapped in the hopeless realm of poverty.

4. "Living in the Bronx had given me the foolish impression that I knew what poverty looked like" (P. 166).

          During his trip to South Africa, Wes 1 had been exposed to a form of poverty he had never seen nor experienced before. Upon seeing the poverty in South Africa, he began to question whether he actually knew what poverty looked like before. In this chapter, Wes Moore stresses that poverty is universal. However, peoples perception of poverty is different. In the Bronx, people may be living in poverty according to the average American standard of living, but in South Africa, Wes notes that the poverty there is so bad, that he would not consider his neighborhood in the Bronx to be impoverished. From this chapter, the reader can see that there is no clear definition of poverty, but most people living in poverty struggle to find opportunities to succeed.

Mentoring
5. " ' So, Wes, what do you plan on doing after you finish school?...Have you ever heard of the Rhodes scholarship?' "

        Mayor Schmoke was a good mentor for Wes 1. Wes's internship provided him with knowledge and skills that would benefit his future. Mayor Schmoke had great advice for Wes that would help steer his life in a particular direction. One of the biggest things that Mayor Schmoke did for Wes was that he told him about the Rhodes scholarship. The Rhodes scholarship was something that really benefitted Wes's education and his future. Wes's relationship with mayor Schmoke was one that would enhance his future success. It was truly good for Wes to have this kind of mentor in his life, to help him find his path in life.

Title Justification Essay #3

       The third part of The Other Wes Moore is about the final paths and directions that the lives of the Wes Moores took. Both of the Wes Moores were making the transition from adolescence to adulthood in this part of the book. Part three of the book is titled "Paths Taken and Expectations Fulfilled". Part three of The Other Wes Moore is titled "Paths Taken and Expectations Fulfilled" because of how the lives of the Wes Moores diverged into completely different directions, partially due to the fact that each of them had different expectations for their lives.

        Wes 1 and Wes 2's lives evidently end up very differently. By the end of the book, Wes 2 would be sentenced to "life in prison without the possibility of parole" (P. 157), while Wes 1 "...would walk across the stage as a Phi Beta Kappa graduate [and be]... the first Rhodes Scholar in thirteen years at Johns Hopkins and the first African-American Rhodes Scholar in school history" (P. 169). The two paths of the Wes Moores began to significantly diverge when they were adolescents, but by the end of the book it is clear that while one Wes Moore would end up successful, the other would never have the possibility of being successful again. Although the two men were from similar backgrounds, their fates were quite different. In the beginning of the chapter, there is a part that Wes Moore writes about one of visits to Wes 2 in prison. Wes 2 talks about " ' We will do what others expect of us" (P. 126). He suggests that peoples expectations for you soon start to assimilate as the expectations you hold for yourself. This is perhaps one of the largest themes of the book. Both the mothers of the Wes Moores had high expectations for their sons and wanted them to graduate and succeed in life. It is not entirely clear what caused the drastic difference between the two fates of the Wes Moores. Perhaps it was the fact that Wes 1 was sent to military school- a place where expectations for students were so high, that it was hard not to succeed. It is possible that the school Wes 2 was in, simply did not hold high expectations for its students, or did not seem to stress the importance of their students' success. In the beginning of the book, Wes 1 had also experienced a lack of motivation to do well in school. He felt as though the teachers did not expect him to do well in school and did not want him there. Maybe the reason why Wes 1 and Wes 2's paths took on such different directions was because of the expectation that their environments held for them. For instance, Wes 1 was expected to work hard in military school, graduate, and be successful. This is a sharp contrast, to the expectations held for kids like Wes 2, who lived in the impoverished neighborhoods of Baltimore. Kids like Wes 2 were not expected to graduate high school, and were expected to fall into the common role of becoming drug dealers and teen parents. The expectations that you and others hold for yourself are your motivations. If you have high expectations for yourself, you will be motivated to be successful, while if you have low expectations for yourself, you will not be motivated to be successful. There is no clear answer for why the lives of the Wes Moores took such different paths but part three of the book suggests that their lives may have ended up so differently because of the expectations they had for themselves and the expectations others had for them.

             Part three of The Other Wes Moore is titled "Paths Taken and Expectations Fulfilled" because of how the lives of the Wes Moores diverged into completely different directions, partially due to the fact that each of them had different expectations for their lives. This final part of the book talks about what led to the final fates of the two Wes Moores. Do you believe that the expectations we have for ourselves and that others have for us, have a strong influence over the direction of our lives?